An official website of the Moorish Nations and Governments

Moorish American Consulate

Language

MOROCCO CONSULAR COURT

Morocco Consular Court never ceased to exist; and never needed to be restored. Great Britain, France, Spain and United States along with many other Countries renounce and relinquished its Consular Court Jurisdiction in Morocco (The Empire). Moroccan Consular Court Jurisdiction remain active throughout the years. See Public Law 856 Chapter 807.

Whereas the laws of the United States invest the ministers and consuls of the United States in certain countries, including Morocco, with judicial authority so far as the exercise of the same is allowed by treaty with such countries and in accordance with usage in such countries; and

Whereas the consuls of the United States in Morocco are permitted to exercise jurisdiction over American nationals under the treaty between the United States and Morocco signed September 16, 1836, and the Act of Algeciras signed April 7, 1906; and the exercise by custom and usage the same jurisdiction over subjects of Morocco or others who may be designated as “proteges” under the Convention of Madrid signed July 3, 1880; and

Whereas Morocco is now the only foreign country where the consuls of the United States exercise such jurisdiction; and

Whereas it is the policy of the United States to discontinue the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction in Morocco at such time as it becomes appropriate: Therefore be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the relinquishment by the President, at such time as he considers this appropriate, of the consular jurisdiction of the United States in Morocco is hereby approved and sections 1693, 4083 to 4091, inclusive, 4097 to 4122, inclusive, and 4125 to 4130, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes, as amended, are repealed effective upon the date which the President determines to be appropriate for the relinquishment of such jurisdiction, except so far as may be necessary to dispose of cases then pending in the consular courts in Morocco.

Approved August 1, 1956.

Morocco Consular Court is an Article III court authorized under International Law and the Treaty of
Peace and Friendship of 1787 and 1836 between the United States and the Moors Moroccan Empire
to settle disputes between the Moors and Colonial CITIZENS of the America’s. See Article 20 and 21
of the said Treaty.
Article 20: “If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall
have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties, and whenever the
Consul shall require any Aid or Assistance from our Government, to enforce his decisions, it shall be
immediately granted to him.”
Article 21: If any Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if a
Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and
equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his
escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.

Public Law 856, Chapter 807.

Morocco Consular Court is an Article III court authorized under International Law and the Treaty of
Peace and Friendship of 1787 and 1836 between the United States and the Moors Moroccan Empire
to settle disputes between the Moors and Colonial CITIZENS of the America’s. See Article 20 and 21
of the said Treaty.

Article 20: “If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall
have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties, and whenever the
Consul shall require any Aid or Assistance from our Government, to enforce his decisions, it shall be
immediately granted to him.”

Article 21: If any Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if a
Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and
equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his
escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.

Title 22 - Foreign Relation and Intercourse
Chapter 3, Section 141-145

Public Law 856, Chapter 807
....

Morocco Consular Court is an Article III court authorized under International Law and the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787 and 1836 between the United States and the Moors Moroccan Empire to settle disputes between the Moors and Colonial CITIZENS of the America’s. See Article 20 and 21 of the said Treaty.

Article 20: “If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties, and whenever the Consul shall require any Aid or Assistance from our Government, to enforce his decisions, it shall be immediately granted to him.”

Article 21: If any Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.

Title 22 - Foreign Relation and Intercourse
Chapter 3, Section 141-145

This North American Continent is under binding International Law, i.e. The Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1787 and 1836 between the United States of North America and the Moors Moroccan Empire, and Pursuant to World Court, I.C.J. International Court of Justice, decision, in the case France V. United States of America, ”Case Concerning rights of nationals of the United States of America in Morocco, Judgment of August 27th, 1952: I.C.J. Reports 1952, p.176.”, and per Article III section 2, clause 1 and 2, and per Article VI, Clause 2, of the Constitution for the United States of North America, which is the supreme law of the land under the supremacy clause; Which states, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every States sh

International Law

TITLE 22 – FOREIGN RELATION AND INTERCOURSE Section 141-145, Chapter 2 – CONSULAR COURT and Judicial Authority Generally in all Cases to carry into full effect, Treaty Law, Embracing all Controversies with Citizens of United States, Canada, Great Britain and others.
Title 22 Chapter 2 Section 141. Judicial Authority Generally. To carry into full effect the provisions of the treaties of the United States with certain foreign countries, the ministers and consuls of the United States in China, Siam, Turkey, Morocco, Muscat, Abyssinia, Persia, and the territories formerly a part of the former Ottoman Empire including Egypt, duly appointed to reside therein, shall, in addition to other powers and duties imposed upon them, respectively, by the provisions of such treaties, respectively, be invested with judicial authority described in sections 141-143, 145-159, 163-174, 176-181, 183, 211, 212, 218, 219, 251-258, and 1172 of this title, sections 701-704 of Title 28, and sections 21-24 of Title 50, which shall appertain to the office of minister and consul, and be a part of the duties belonging thereto, wherein, and so far as, the same is allowed by treaty, and in accordance with the usages of the countries in their intercourse with the Franks or other foreign Christian nations.
Title 22 Chapter 2 Section 142. General jurisdiction in criminal cases. The officers mentioned in section 141 of this title are fully empowered to arraigh and try, in the manner provided in sections 141-143, 145-159, 163-174, 176-181, 183, 211, 212, 218, 219, 251-258, and 1172 of this title, sections 701-704 of Title 28, and sections 21-24 of Title 50, all citizens of the United States charged with offenses against law, committed in such countries, respectively, and to sentence such offenders in the manner in such sections authorized; and each of them is authorized to issue all such processes as are suitable and necessary to carry this authority into execution. (R. S. S 4084)
Title 22 Chapter 2 Section 143. General jurisdiction in civil cases, venue. Such officers are also invested with all the judicial authority necessary to execute the provisions of such treaties, respectively, in regard to civil rights, whether of property or person; and they shall entertain jurisdiction In matters of contract, at the port where, or nearest to which, the contract was made, or at the port at which, or nearest to which, it was to be executed, and in all other matters, at the port where, or nearest to which, the cause of controversy arose, or at the port where, or nearest to which, the damage complained of was sustained, provided such port be one of the ports at which the United States are represented by consuls. Such jurisdiction shall embrace all controversies between citizens of the United States, or others, provided for by such treaties, respectively. (R. S. S 4086)

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

Rulings and Cases of Special Interest

Public access to Consular Court case information is provided through the Judiciary Authority of the court. It permits the public to view documents that have been filed within the (CCFS) Court’s Case Filing System. It also permits the public to view this database for a particular individual, case, case name, and other case related information.

CCFS also provides access to the case summary, docket entries, and copies of the documents filed within other colorable venues, individuals and Parties. If a paper document is needed, or if a case cannot be located when searching by case number, party name, or using the (PCI ) Party Case Index, then you can contact the Court to request a court record.

Rulings and Cases of Special Interest are published at the discretion of the consular court authority and consuls.
Note: Parties requesting a record must have a valid reason, interest or an investigation into the case. .

France V. U.S.A.

Aug 27, 1952

International Court of Justice Communique No. 52/19.

United States v. King

JANUARY, 1845

United States Supreme court 44 U.S. 773 (1845)

United States v. Turner,

DECEMBER, 1850.

United States Supreme court 52 U.S. 663 (1850).

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

International Court of Justice
Communique No. 52/19.

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212

USA v. BEY

December 14, 2025

Consular Court Case: 777-000000212