An official website of the Moorish Nations and Governments
[3] The Senators and Representative before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States shall be bound by Oath of Affirmation, to support this Constitution, but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Quaification to any Office or publice Trust under the United States.
In maritime law, the law of that nation or country whose flag is flown by a particular vessel. A shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the master that he intends the law of that flag to regulate such contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him.
The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787 / 1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire authorized the United States to exercise consular jurisdiction over American nationals (Moors) within the dominions of the Moroccan Empire (Morocco) whenever any citizen of the United States had a dispute or controversy with a Moor, and vice versa. Thus, the United States established United States consular courts in Morocco by authority of such Treaty. As of August 1, 1956, the United States relinquished their consular jurisdiction in Morocco as shown in the below document starting at the bottom of page However, Moors of the Moroccan Empire are also authorized by the same above Treaty to exercise consular jurisdiction for their protection and enforcement of Treaty rights and obligations whenever Moors have disputes with any citizen of the United States (or subject). Consular court is the proper venue where Moors obtain their remedy!
This North American continent is under binding international treaty law, i.e., the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire, which superseded the organic Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787 between the United States of America and His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Morocco. This Treaty is proof of there being two (2) jurisdictions that are foreign to each other, and are operating at North America for the purpose of amity and commerce: (1) the United States Republic of North America and (2) the Moroccan Empire which is the home government of the land.
Consuls are not diplomatic agents; they perform various services for a state or its subjects in another state, without, however, representing the former in the full sense. They may be nationals of either state, and generally they are made subject to the authority of the diplomatic representative of the state for which they act. They watch over commercial interests of the state for which they act; collect information for it; help its nationals with advice, administer their property if they die abroad, and register their births, deaths, and marriages; they authenticate documents for legal purposes, take depositions from witnesses, visa passports, and the like.” J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations. 216 (5th ed. 1955)
Judge Hsu Mo declares that, in his opinion, the jurisdictional rights of the United States of America in the French Zone of Morocco are limited to those provided in Articles 20 and 21 of its Treaty with Morocco of September 16th, 1836, and that the United States is not entitled to exercise consular jurisdiction in cases involving the application to United States citizens of those provisions of the Act of Algeciras of 1906 which, for their enforcement, carried certain sanctions. The Act of Algeciras, as far as the jurisdictional clauses are concerned, was concluded on the basis of a kind of consular jurisdiction as it existed at that time in its full form and in complete uniformity among the Powers in Morocco. The various provisions, in referring to “consular jurisdiction”, “competent consular authority”,”consular court of the defendant”, etc., clearly meant that jurisdiction which was being uniformly exercised by foreign States over their respective nationals as defendants in all cases. They did not mean such limited jurisdiction as might be exercised by the United States consular courts, in accordance with Article 20 of the Moroccan-United States Treaty of 1836, in cases involving United States citizens or protégés only.
Any Case involving a Moor Moorish American and any Citizen of the UNITED STATES or CANADA or other etc… Must be heard in a Consular Court Venue; Civil or Criminal:
CCFS also provides access to the case summary, docket entries, and copies of the documents filed within other colorable venues, individuals and Parties. If a paper document is needed, or if a case cannot be located when searching by case number, party name, or using the (PCI ) Party Case Index, then you can contact the Court to request a court record.
International Court of Justice.
Communique No. 52/19.
United States Supreme court 44 U.S. 773 (1845)
United States Supreme court 52 U.S. 663 (1850).
United States Supreme court 586 U. S. ____ (2019
United States Supreme Court, 3 U.S. 3 Dall. 199 (1796)
United States Supreme Court, 5 U.S. 103 (1801)
Consular Court Case:777-000000249
Consular Court Case: 777-000000225
Consular Court Case: 777-000000247
Consular Court Caso: 777-000000235
Consular Court Case:777-000000251
